Christian Apologetics Alliance

answering seekers, equipping Christians, and demonstrating the truth of the Christian worldview

  • About the CAA
    • Statement of Faith
    • Leadership and Ministries
      • Blog Leadership
    • Authors
      • Write for Us
    • Join the CAA
    • Friends and Partners
      • How to Partner with the CAA
    • Donations
  • Resources
    • CAA Chapters
      • CAA Chapter Leaders and Locations
        • CAA Huntsville Chapter
          • CAA Huntsville Chapter – Local Resources
      • Churches: Host a CAA Chapter
      • Chapter Application Form
    • CAA Speaking Team
    • CAA Community
    • Apologetics for Parents
    • Apologetics Bloggers Alliance
    • CAA Catechism
    • Apologetics Certificate Programs
    • Christian Apologetics Search Engine
    • Events | Ratio Christi
    • Ask the Alliance
    • Media
      • Logos
      • Banners
      • Wallpaper
  • EQUIPPED: The CAA Quarterly
  • Contact Us

The Mysterious Magi of Matthew 2, Part Two.

February 25, 2015 by JC Lamont

The Holy Men by Liz Lemon Swindle

In part one of this series, I briefly described the origins of Zoroastrianism, the religion held by the magi mentioned in Matthew 2, who left their homeland and traveled to Israel to worship Jesus. We noted the passages mentioned in the Old Testament where these monotheistic adherents of Zoroastrianism equated their deity with the God of the Jews.

In contrast to the polytheistic paganism of other cultures, Judaism and Zoroastrianism held several core beliefs in common. An overview of Zoroastrian doctrines are 1) good will eventually prevail over evil (Rev. 20, 21); 2) creation was initially perfectly good, but was subsequently corrupted by evil (Gen 1:31, Rom. 5:12, 8:20-22); 3) the world will ultimately be restored to the perfection it had at the time of creation (Rev. 21:1, 4); and 4) the “salvation for the individual depended on the sum of [that person’s] thoughts, words and deeds, and there could be no intervention, whether compassionate or capricious, by any divine being to alter this.” Thus, each human bears the responsibility for the fate of his own soul (Ezekiel 18).1

By the time of Jesus’ birth, the Jews and Persians had lived side by side for over five centuries, and the Persians (who conquered Babylon while the Jews were captive there) had access to various sacred texts. Such prophecies included the one made by the Babylonian sorcerer, Balaam, who foretold the rising of a star in Israel signaled a king (Numbers 24:17), as well as the multiple prophecies of the Jewish seer, Daniel, who worked as a counselor and adviser to several kings of Babylonian and Medean (a Persian puppet king) origin. Most likely of significant interest to the magi would be Daniel’s prophecies recorded in Daniel 7:13-14 and 12:13, which speak of one given authority to rule all peoples, and the judgment of the dead. In Zoroastrianism, this role would be fulfilled by Mithras, who, with the exception of being a created being, showed remarkable similarities with the Old Testament Angel of the Lord (many Christian scholars believe this ethereal messenger of the Jewish God was Jesus preincaranate). For instance, in the Yasht (a Zoroastrian hymn), we see Mithras in his role as ‘Judge of Souls’ as the rewarder of good and annihilator of the bad. Mithras was considered omniscient, undeceivable, infallible, eternally watchful, and never-resting.

It is not unlikely that after observing the “star of Bethlehem,” and studying the prophetic sacred texts available to them that the magi then looked into other Jewish scriptures. Quite possibly they compared Isaiah 7:14 (the Lord himself will give you the sign. Look! The virgin will conceive a child! She will give birth to a son and will call him Immanuel, which means ‘God is with us’) with their own belief in a coming restorer born of a holy maid, who would destroy evil: “We worship the Fravashi (guardian angel) of the holy maid, Eredat-fedhi, who is called Vispa-taurvairi. She is called Vispa-taurvairi (the all-destroying) because she will bring him forth, who will destroy the malice of Daevas (demons) and men….”2

All this should be taken into consideration when disputing the validity of Matthew 2, for when understanding the religious and cultural background of these “wise men from the east,” it is not inconceivable that they chose to undergo the arduous journey to Israel to worship to  the newborn “king of the Jews.”

 

1Quoted from the Zoroastrian Text frasho.kereti (also spelt Frashokereti).

2Book XXX.142 of the The Zend-Avesta: The Sîrôzahs, Yasts, and Nyâyis translated by James Darmesteter.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket

Filed Under: CAA Original, Historical Confirmations of Scripture

Comments

  1. willy kazadi says

    January 11, 2016 at 6:26 pm

    I found part 1and 2 very instructives ! Thanks for these serious works !

Connect

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

What Interests You?

  • The Problem of Evil, Suffering, and Hell
  • Apologetics Methods, Tactics, & Logic
    • Incarnational Apologetics
  • Arguments for God
  • Science, Reason, and Faith
  • The Reliability of the Bible
    • Undesigned Scriptural Coincidences
  • The Historicity of Jesus & the Resurrection
  • Worldviews & World Religions
    • Evaluating Islam
    • The New Atheism
    • Post-modernism, Relativism, and Truth
  • Imaginative Apologetics
    • Fiction Book, Movie, & TV Reviews
  • Contemporary Issues
  • Youth and Parents
  • Full List of Categories

Archives

Christian Apologetics Alliance is a Top 100 Christian Blog

Unity Statement

In essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, in all things charity. The Christian Apologetics Alliance (CAA) is united in our Statement of Faith. The CAA does not, as an organization, have positions on many of the doctrinal or theological debates that take place within the church. Our primary concern is to promote the gracious, rational defense of the central claims of Christianity and the critique of opposing systems of thought. The CAA joyfully welcomes Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and diverse Protestant believers, and we are committed to treating all these traditions with respect in our community.

Copyright © 2011 - 2020 Christian Apologetics Alliance