Dear Colleague:
It’s time for Christianity to reclaim the intellectual high ground we once held. That means you and I have a lot of work to do. Chances are some of it will be different from what we’ve been doing. There is a new frontier in
apologetics today. The big questions are no longer what they used to be. And most of us are just beginning to see it.
It’s no longer mostly about discovering new reasons to believe in Christ, and it’s not primarily about finding ways to counter atheists’ objections. Those are still important questions, but they’re not the big one; they’re not at the frontier. The reason is simple: that work’s been done. No, I don’t mean there’s nothing new to discover, far from it—I’m working on a new version of the moral argument myself. What I mean is that generally speaking, with just a few exceptions, for every hard question out there we already have a good answer. Several good answers, actually for most questions.
But there’s one huge question we’ve hardly begun to think about. When we finally do get our minds on it, I believe we’ll see the world change before our very eyes. What is this next frontier, this next world-changing question? Actually it’s three questions, not just one:
What do we dream of the world looking like five years or twenty-five years from now, as a result of our efforts? Is it a God-sized dream? And what will it take to see that change happen?
Here’s my answer, which I would imagine is similar in many ways to yours:
My prayer is that when anyone in the Western world (or the widely Western-influenced world) thinks of Christianity, they would think of the intellectual credibility of the faith and Christians’ intellectual leadership in community and culture.
We’re a long way from that point. Intellectual strength is not the first thing that comes to mind when most people think about Christianity. It’s a God-sized dream to hope it might happen. But why not? God is God, and we have the truth! Why shouldn’t his truth be the kind of thing the world knows it has to contend with?
Unfortunately that vision has competition. I’m not talking about competition from secularists, but from within myself. I have another dream that competes with that one: That I will be widely published and well known, have lots of face time with famous Christian leaders, and receive lots of requests to speak, for handsome fees.
Maybe you experience the same thing. Unless you’re shy of notoriety or can’t bear the thought of standing in front of a crowd—neither of which is likely in our field of apologetics—you probably feel at least some of that. God made us to respond to positive feedback, especially when it has a quick turn-around time. It takes discipline to remind ourselves just how small these aspirations for prestige really are, compared to the big picture of what God really wants to accomplish through us. They shrink us both spiritually and strategically.
I didn’t really need to remind you of that; you knew it already. I brought it up because I think you might be at least somewhat like me, with small visions of personal glory trying to crowd out what should be great ones for God’s glory.
That’s not the only way, though, in which we apologists tend to think small. We focus on the current engagement: the question we’re addressing in this article or that, the crowd we’re speaking to, or the debate we hope to win. There’s nothing wrong with that, on one level. It’s a very good thing to equip, to encourage, or to persuade in the name of Christ. It’s just that taking things one engagement at a time isn’t enough for the need of the day. We need to be working on turning around Christian intellectual culture, to the end that every church can engage its own people or its own community from a position of strength. Winning over one group at a time—our usual tactic in apologetics—isn’t going to get us there.
There are some among us who are thinking more strategically, but we all need to begin taking a higher and broader view of what God could do through us.
How do we begin doing that? First, by assessing our dreams. Are we dreaming of the big publishing contract, the big crowds, and the triumph in debate? Sure, I’ll admit I like seeing myself in that picture. If that’s part of your dream, acknowledge it. Then decide whether it’s helping or hindering you from accomplishing something far bigger and more significant.
What is the far better vision God has for you? Are you dreaming of something bigger than the engagement—bigger than you could manage on your own? That’s what I’m praying and working toward. And I couldn’t imagine my dreams coming to pass apart from God doing it.
The new frontier, today’s biggest question in apologetics, is how can we be far more strategic than we have ever been?
I’ll ‘fess up: I’m a dual-vocation minister, working in both apologetics and strategy. I’ve been helping others in the apologetics community thinking more about strategy. That’s my first goal, simple as that: If you’re wondering about God’s vision for your ministry after reading this letter, or if you’re worried about what to do with the vision you have, then this letter has accomplished part of its purpose. I’m only taking this a step at a time, so I’ll leave it there for now.
But if you’re really worried about this, and really wondering about how to enter the new frontier of apologetics, feel free to get in touch with me. I’d be glad to come work with you. Keep your eye on the Christian Apologetics Alliance for further discussion on this, too; for there are meetings on this new frontier in the works. Maybe we’ll be able to bring all this together sometime soon.
Until then, grace and peace to you.
Tom Gilson
Arturo Gutierrez says
I must admit that I feel like a sheep entering a WolfCon, but as I read your article an idea popped into my head which I thought may be interesting to share.
-If there’s one thing our Internet age has left clear is that no side (in this case, theism vs atheism) is ever going to “win”. The more one side attacks, the more the other weaponizes. This has led to such escalation of arguments, such endless debates and myriads of youtube videos and counter-videos, that I’m pretty sure we’re not that far away from seeing atheist/theist superheroes wearing spandex spawning into battle.
And as I thought about how this social gridlock may ever be resolved, I thought about a case where a similar gridlock was (sort of) resolved: The PC vs Mac debates.
I know its unfair to compare religious views to preference in your use of what computer to use. But I think there’s one important lesson that the PC vs Mac wars have given us: when both sides acknowledge that they CAN live together, the end of the struggle is at sight.
And that possibility is what I think is missing in the modern theism vs atheism struggles. Both sides are determined to extinguish the other, both imagining a future where the other doesn’t exists anymore and were it has been hate-emailed out of existence.
But, is that really what we want? Haven’t we already tried that and failed horribly at it? staining, perhaps forever, the two positions in the process…
Now, I can understand if some sort of capitulation is perceived as the unthinkable option. After all, deep within the Christian mentality is the idea that, because you hold the capital T Truth about the ultimate nature of reality, it is indefensible to give up on trying to share this Truth with the others who don’t know it yet. But the thing is, the other side is thinking the exact same thing about you! PC vs Macs all over again…
I don’t know. I just wonder if the far-future Christianity is one were the core principles have been changed and were it is no longer believed that non-believers will go to hell or a similar less-than-nice outcome, allowing the possibility in future Christians minds to not only NOT feel bad for those who don’t share their faiths, but maybe even happy for them, who live in the “wrong” worldview.
Because I don’t know about you guys, but I’m TIRED of this conflict…
John says
Yes. Let us reason together. With God’s help, we will reclaim the intellectual high ground. I’m trying to create a blog site where atheists and Christians can discuss matters together. http://johnlepp1.wix.com/fact-vs-value#!contact/c1kcz