Christian Apologetics Alliance

answering seekers, equipping Christians, and demonstrating the truth of the Christian worldview

  • About the CAA
    • Statement of Faith
    • Leadership and Ministries
      • Blog Leadership
    • Authors
      • Write for Us
    • Join the CAA
    • Friends and Partners
      • How to Partner with the CAA
    • Donations
  • Resources
    • CAA Chapters
      • CAA Chapter Leaders and Locations
        • CAA Huntsville Chapter
          • CAA Huntsville Chapter – Local Resources
      • Churches: Host a CAA Chapter
      • Chapter Application Form
    • CAA Speaking Team
    • CAA Community
    • Apologetics for Parents
    • Apologetics Bloggers Alliance
    • CAA Catechism
    • Apologetics Certificate Programs
    • Christian Apologetics Search Engine
    • Events | Ratio Christi
    • Ask the Alliance
    • Media
      • Logos
      • Banners
      • Wallpaper
  • EQUIPPED: The CAA Quarterly
  • Contact Us

The Problem of Evil & Suffering

September 25, 2013 by CAA Catechism

The-Problem-of-Evil-&-Suffering

[This post is a work in progress as part of the CAA Catechism.]

[Add the title only in the title field, not in the body of the post.]

Summary in 400 words or less:

The problem of evil usually refers to the issue of how an all-good, all-powerful and all-knowing God could exist given the evil in this world. The logical/incompatibility version says that it’s logically impossible for God and evil to coexist, but most philosophers have dismissed this because one just needs to point out a possible reason for God to permit evil. The evidential version says that given the great amount and kinds of suffering which seems pointless, it is improbable that God exists. The emotional reason is regarding those we struggle with God due to personal suffering in their lives.

Some distinctions: A defense merely gives possibilities for evil, while a full-fledged theodicy aims to justify God by giving God’s actual reasons. Moral evils are evils done by free moral agents, while natural evils are evils such as natural disasters.

Here are some defenses/theodicies:

(1) Free Will

God could have wanted to give us (and angels) significant moral free will which entails the possibility of us choosing evil.

(2) Soul-Making

Human persons were not made in a completed state but were created to undergo spiritual growth to ultimately be in communion with God. Some evils and sufferings may seem pointless in bringing happiness on earth but may help in moral transformation and bringing one to communion with God.

(3) Skeptical Theism

God has morally sufficient reasons to accomplish some greater good that we do not know of or cannot completely comprehend.

(4) No best possible world

God has to allow some evil. Whatever evil He allows, there will always be an evil which we find too great and think should not be permitted. If God removes that evil which we consider too great, then it will result in another evil which we consider too great. Hence whatever world God created, there would be evils in which we think God should not have permitted.

(5) Considering the total evidence for God

This view concedes that God’s existence may be improbable given seemingly pointless evil, but not against the total evidence for God. In fact, the ontological argument if true, it is an argument that shows such a being must exist necessarily, even in worlds with evil.

(6) Afterlife

Our temporal suffering will be addressed and corrected in eternity. God has already done something (the Cross), is doing something (providentially keeping the world from too much evil and sending the Church to help correct the world), and will do something (ultimately punish sin in Hell)

(7) Felix Cupa Theodicy

God’s incarnation and atonement (an infinite good) can only be actualised in a world where free creatures sin.

Scripture for YouVersion:

Short audio/video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPAElnUDSLI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtx5GyP7i7w

Three questions (1 fill-in-the-blank, 1 multiple choice, and one discussion question):

References for further reading:

Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.

Dougherty, Trent. Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Murray, Michael J. Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.

Snyder, Daniel. The Evidential Argument from Evil. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.

McBrayer, Justin P. The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.

Rea, Michael. Evil and the Hiddenness of God.

Collaboration notes:

We may split this up into other documents:

Intellectual (Logical, Evidential) | Emotional

Free Will Defense

Collaborators: Frederick Choo, Shandon Guthrie, Marcia Montenegro, Bill Dyer
[Add your name here only if you have created this topic or contributed valuable content or editing to this topic.]

[Add a copyright-free, relevant image to the body of the post (click the Add Media button), as well as going back in and selecting it as the featured image.]

Type “YES” and contact Maryann when at least three collaborators agree this is ready to be shared with YouVersion:

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket

Filed Under: CAA Catechism, CAA Original, The Problem of Evil, Suffering, and Hell

Connect

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

What Interests You?

  • The Problem of Evil, Suffering, and Hell
  • Apologetics Methods, Tactics, & Logic
    • Incarnational Apologetics
  • Arguments for God
  • Science, Reason, and Faith
  • The Reliability of the Bible
    • Undesigned Scriptural Coincidences
  • The Historicity of Jesus & the Resurrection
  • Worldviews & World Religions
    • Evaluating Islam
    • The New Atheism
    • Post-modernism, Relativism, and Truth
  • Imaginative Apologetics
    • Fiction Book, Movie, & TV Reviews
  • Contemporary Issues
  • Youth and Parents
  • Full List of Categories

Archives

Christian Apologetics Alliance is a Top 100 Christian Blog

Unity Statement

In essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, in all things charity. The Christian Apologetics Alliance (CAA) is united in our Statement of Faith. The CAA does not, as an organization, have positions on many of the doctrinal or theological debates that take place within the church. Our primary concern is to promote the gracious, rational defense of the central claims of Christianity and the critique of opposing systems of thought. The CAA joyfully welcomes Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and diverse Protestant believers, and we are committed to treating all these traditions with respect in our community.

Copyright © 2011 - 2020 Christian Apologetics Alliance