Christian Apologetics Alliance

answering seekers, equipping Christians, and demonstrating the truth of the Christian worldview

  • About the CAA
    • Statement of Faith
    • Leadership and Ministries
      • Blog Leadership
    • Authors
      • Write for Us
    • Join the CAA
    • Friends and Partners
      • How to Partner with the CAA
    • Donations
  • Resources
    • CAA Chapters
      • CAA Chapter Leaders and Locations
        • CAA Huntsville Chapter
          • CAA Huntsville Chapter – Local Resources
      • Churches: Host a CAA Chapter
      • Chapter Application Form
    • CAA Speaking Team
    • CAA Community
    • Apologetics for Parents
    • Apologetics Bloggers Alliance
    • CAA Catechism
    • Apologetics Certificate Programs
    • Christian Apologetics Search Engine
    • Events | Ratio Christi
    • Ask the Alliance
    • Media
      • Logos
      • Banners
      • Wallpaper
  • EQUIPPED: The CAA Quarterly
  • Contact Us

The God Question: A TV Series Investigates the Relationship Between Science and Faith

September 14, 2013 by Jonathan McLatchie

The God Question, a TV series bringing together world renowned contributors on both sides of the debate on God and science, explores the question of whether there is design evident in the universe.

The series, a Scottish venture that promises to reach 170 million potential viewers internationally, features figures of note in the intelligent design community, including Stephen Meyer, Douglas Axe, Bill Dembski, John Lennox, Steve Fuller, and Denyse O’Leary. It also includes thinkers on the other side of the debate, such as Peter Atkins, Michael Ruse, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and many others. Theistic evolutionists including Denis Alexander, Francis Collins, and Ken Miller also star. For a complete list of contributors, see here.

Divided into three programs, dealing with “The Cosmos,” “Life and Evolution,” and “Mind and Consciousness,” the series is spectacularly produced and commendably provides a fair and balanced discussion of the issues it unpacks.

Wherever you currently stand on “The God Question” or the question of evolution and design, you will find this TV series intellectually stimulating and challenging. Note too that it has now been produced as a DVD (which you can purchase here) and comes with a companion study guide for small group discussion.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket

Filed Under: Argument from Consciousness, Arguments for God, Biological Intelligent Design, Cosmological Arguments, Cosmological Fine Tuning, Kalam Cosmological Argument, Science, Reason, and Faith, Scientific Confirmation of a Beginning, Teleological (Design) Arguments

Comments

  1. Shri Datta says

    September 24, 2013 at 10:41 am

    One religion says that the God is awareness. Another
    religion says that God is all pervading cosmic energy. Another religion says
    that God is light and another religion says that God is fire etc. Like this,
    different created items of this universe were taken as the basic real God.
    Hence quarrels started, which were intensified by debates. People sitting
    before a dining table are quarrelling with each other since one says that the
    vessel is gold, another says that the plate is gold, another says that the
    spoon is gold and another says that the tumbler is gold. This quarrel will
    never end because no item on the dining table is gold! Everyone is treating a
    particular item as gold. Treating an item as gold is totally different from the
    actual item to be gold.

    Similarly, the reality is that God is unimaginable,
    who is beyond this imaginable universe. The simple reason for this is that the
    universe is fundamentally constituted of space or volume, which is the basic
    subtle energy and God is beyond the space since God has no dimensions. Now you
    can treat any meritorious item of the creation as God based on the merits liked
    by you neglecting the defects. The awareness is not God because it is not all
    pervading. The cosmic energy is not God because it is inert. The light and fire
    also cannot be God for the same reason that they are inert. But any of these
    items can be treated as God for the sake of meditation and worship.

    Such worship is
    called as the worship of representative model (Pratika Upasana). The direct
    worship (Sakshat Upasana) is also possible when God enters a human being to
    give right direction through propagation of right spiritual knowledge. In such
    case also, every such human being is God and the unimaginable God exists in
    such every human being. The human being is only the medium of God, but such
    charged human being can be treated as real God like the electrified wire being
    treated as the electricity itself.

    Hence Krishna,
    Buddha, Jesus, Mohammad etc becomes God and there need not be any quarrel in
    this point also for the sake of world peace based on the harmony of religions.
    This fundamental concept is revealed since simultaneously it is fortunate that
    today there is confidence on the receiving power of the stable and steady
    scientific analysis of human beings.

  2. Shri Datta says

    September 24, 2013 at 10:40 am

    God exists at the
    boundary of universe

    Unimaginable boundary
    of the universe is the proof of God

    Today, the logical analysis is not only sharp but also
    steady due to experimental verification of every concept. The receiving nature
    of the people is quite stable due to the scientific analysis. People are not
    fast in applying the theoretical tautology to arrive at hasty conclusions. In
    view of the stability of the phase of intelligence, the projection of the real
    unimaginable nature of God will not face the danger of non-existence. The
    scientist may not believe any miracle and may say that nothing is unimaginable.
    But the scientist must accept the unimaginable boundary of the universe.

    The scientist may argue like this:- “When the universe
    is imaginable made of imaginable cosmic energy as the fundamental cause, how
    can you say that the boundary of the universe is unimaginable? Just like the
    ocean is water, the boundary of the ocean must be also be the same water.
    Hence, the boundary of the imaginable universe must be also imaginable”. This
    type of argument is not acceptable if you analyze the subtle point of the
    boundary. When you reach the edge of the ocean and stand on it, you must find
    water on one side and the land, which is not water on the other side. The
    knowledge of both water and land is necessary to fix the boundary of the ocean.
    Land is not water. If land is also water, then the boundary of the ocean is not
    achieved. Similarly, when you reach the boundary of the imaginable universe,
    you must perceive the imaginable nature of the universe on one side and the
    unimaginable nature on the other side. If the unimaginable nature is also
    imaginable, then the boundary of imaginable nature is not achieved.

    When the unimaginable nature cannot be imagined by
    your intelligence, it means you have never reached the boundary of the imaginable
    universe. Unless you perceive both imaginable and unimaginable natures, the
    boundary of the imaginable nature is not achieved. Hence the boundary of the
    universe is always unimaginable from the other side. Some scientists say that
    the diameter of the universe is 200 billion light years.

    Another scientist laughed at this by asking that if he
    travels all this diameter and reach the compound wall of universe, what is
    present beyond such compound wall? One scientist says that the universe is
    constantly expanding! This is again a laughable concept since it finally means
    that you can never achieve the boundary of the universe. Hence, by all means
    the scientist has to accept the existence of the unimaginable entity, which is
    the other side of the boundary of the universe. It is not the boundary if the
    other side is not achieved. The scientist has stable and steady intelligence to
    realize the truth in this argument unlike a theoretical ancient tautologist.
    The unimaginable item, which is beyond the boundary of this imaginable universe
    is called as God.

    When this
    universe is projected from God, you will touch God on reaching the edge of the
    universe. You can never touch God since He is unimaginable. It means that you
    can never reach the boundary of this universe. Today this fundamental concept
    is revealed due to confidence on the stable and steady analytical faculty of
    real scientists. Ofcourse, foolish conservative scientists also exist even
    today in small number and this is inevitable at any time. Moreover, today there
    is lot of demand for the revelation of this basic concept in view of the
    violent terrorism that arose from the differences between the religions.

  3. Shri Datta says

    September 24, 2013 at 10:40 am

    Why unimaginability of
    God is not stressed earlier

    The real and absolute nature of God is unimaginable.
    The previous preachers know this point very well since they performed several
    miracles, which were unimaginable events only. The miracles stand as practical
    proof for the existence of unimaginable entity that performs the unimaginable
    events. When the preachers were performing so many miracles, can’t they know
    the existence of unimaginable item?. It is very simple and no effort is
    necessary for the performer of the miracles to understand the existence of unimaginable
    entity and to propagate the same concept. In such case, why the preachers did
    not say that God is unimaginable?

    There may be difficulty to believe this concept by
    looking at others performing the miracles. But there should be no trace of difficulty
    of the performer himself to understand this concept, which is demonstrated by
    himself. Even demons performed miracles, but they were unable to grasp the
    concept due to their devilish nature of ignorance. Thus, demons can be excused
    but not the intellectual preachers in revealing this concept. There must be
    some strong reason for the preachers in not revealing this concept inspite of
    the demonstration by themselves. Such strong reason is that the intellectual
    level of ancient people was simply constituted by the conclusions of
    theoretical logic exercised through debates and discussions only. There was no
    experimental phase to arrive at steady conclusions. Today, lot of practical
    evidence is required to contradict any concept. In the ancient times mere sharp
    logic was sufficient to contradict the concept.

    There was no steadiness in the establishment of the
    concept and the fate of the concept was depending on simply the intellectual
    sharpness of anybody. In such time, if God was declared as unimaginable, the
    immediate danger was the possibility of non-existence of the unimaginable
    items. In such case, the very basic existence of God becomes critical to be
    believed. In fact, before the arrival of Shankara the fast logic of
    intelligence ended in the final conclusion that everything is unreal including
    God. The theory of relativity was applied to every item of the creation with
    high speed. At any step, the cause is real and the product is unreal since the
    reality of the product is based on the reality of the cause. But the cause
    itself is the product of another cause.

    This analysis
    went on ad-infinitum and the final conclusion was that everything is unreal
    (Shunyavada of Buddhists). In such situation, if you say that the ultimate
    cause is unimaginable, people would just laugh at it by saying that the
    unimaginable ultimate cause must be disposed more conveniently as unreal. The
    word ‘unimaginable’ indirectly means negation of a logical answer. With this
    fear, Shankara proposed God as pure awareness having no attributes (Nirguna).
    Later on Ramanuja and Madhva also proposed God as awareness with attributes as
    qualified (Saguna). This difference is
    immaterial because the basically real unimaginable God was not projected. Only
    mediated God was presented, who was the awareness charged by unimaginable God.

    http://www.universal-spirituality.org

    Universal Spirituality for World Peace

Connect

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search

What Interests You?

  • The Problem of Evil, Suffering, and Hell
  • Apologetics Methods, Tactics, & Logic
    • Incarnational Apologetics
  • Arguments for God
  • Science, Reason, and Faith
  • The Reliability of the Bible
    • Undesigned Scriptural Coincidences
  • The Historicity of Jesus & the Resurrection
  • Worldviews & World Religions
    • Evaluating Islam
    • The New Atheism
    • Post-modernism, Relativism, and Truth
  • Imaginative Apologetics
    • Fiction Book, Movie, & TV Reviews
  • Contemporary Issues
  • Youth and Parents
  • Full List of Categories

Archives

Christian Apologetics Alliance is a Top 100 Christian Blog

Unity Statement

In essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, in all things charity. The Christian Apologetics Alliance (CAA) is united in our Statement of Faith. The CAA does not, as an organization, have positions on many of the doctrinal or theological debates that take place within the church. Our primary concern is to promote the gracious, rational defense of the central claims of Christianity and the critique of opposing systems of thought. The CAA joyfully welcomes Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and diverse Protestant believers, and we are committed to treating all these traditions with respect in our community.

Copyright © 2011 - 2020 Christian Apologetics Alliance